Hunter Biden’s plea deal on hold after judge questions DOJ’s terms

Hunter Biden’s plea deal

What happened at the hearing?

Hunter Biden, the son of President Joe Biden, was expected to plead guilty to two misdemeanor counts of willful failure to pay income taxes as part of a deal announced last month with the Department of Justice (DOJ). However, the plea deal was put on hold after the judge presiding over the case questioned the parameters of the agreement reached with the DOJ.

The hearing took place on July 26 at the U.S. District Court in Wilmington, Delaware. According to court transcripts, Judge Colm F. Connolly expressed concern that the plea deal did not specify how much money Hunter Biden owed to the IRS, how he would pay it back, and what would happen if he failed to do so. The judge also noted that the plea deal did not include any probation or supervision for Hunter Biden, who has a history of substance abuse and other legal troubles.

The judge said he was not comfortable accepting the plea deal without more information and clarity from both sides. He asked the prosecutors and Hunter Biden’s attorneys to submit additional briefs by August 11 and scheduled another hearing for August 18.

Why did the prosecutors change their decision?

Hunter Biden’s attorney, Abbe Lowell, who is a prominent criminal defense lawyer and former White House counsel, criticized the DOJ prosecutors for changing “their decision on the fly” during the hearing. He said that there were three possibilities for why the prosecutors did not stick to the terms of the plea deal that they had agreed to with Hunter Biden’s lawyers.

“One, they wrote something and weren’t clear what they meant; two, they knew what they meant and misstated it to counsel, or third, they change their view as they were standing in court in Delaware,” Lowell said on CBS’s “Face the Nation” on Sunday.

Lowell said that he had emails and letters from the prosecutors that confirmed the terms of the plea deal, which he said were “very clear and very simple”. He said that the prosecutors had agreed to drop all other charges against Hunter Biden, including a felony count of making a false statement on a firearm application, in exchange for his guilty plea on the tax charges. He also said that the prosecutors had agreed that Hunter Biden would pay a fine of $75,000 and restitution of $463,000 to the IRS.

However, during the hearing, the prosecutors seemed to backtrack on some of these terms. They said that they had not agreed to drop the firearm charge, but only to defer it for one year. They also said that they had not agreed to a specific amount of restitution, but only to a range of $200,000 to $500,000. They also said that they had not agreed to waive any probation or supervision for Hunter Biden, but only to recommend it to the judge.

Lowell accused the prosecutors of being “incompetent” and “unprofessional” for changing their position in court. He said that he hoped that the judge would accept the plea deal as originally agreed upon by both sides.

What are the implications of this case?

The case against Hunter Biden has attracted a lot of attention and controversy because of his political connections and personal issues. Hunter Biden has been under scrutiny for his business dealings in Ukraine and China, which have been criticized by Republicans as potential conflicts of interest for his father. He has also faced allegations of sexual misconduct, drug addiction, and paternity disputes.

The case has also raised questions about whether Hunter Biden received preferential treatment from the DOJ because of his family ties. Some legal experts have argued that the plea deal offered to him was too lenient and generous compared to other defendants facing similar charges. They have also suggested that the prosecutors may have been influenced by political pressure or interference from higher-ups in the DOJ or the White House.

However, other legal experts have defended the plea deal as reasonable and appropriate given Hunter Biden’s cooperation and willingness to admit his wrongdoing. They have also pointed out that there is no evidence of any improper influence or intervention in the case by anyone outside of the DOJ or the court.

The outcome of this case could have significant consequences for Hunter Biden’s future and reputation, as well as for his father’s presidency and legacy. If he is able to resolve his case with a guilty plea and avoid jail time or probation, he may be able to move on with his life and career. However, if he is unable to secure a plea deal or faces more serious charges or penalties, he may face more legal troubles and public scrutiny.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here